Please complete this form to agree to receive ongoing information via email from Wilson Learning.
Harvard Harvard Program on Negotiation - Top ten negotiation failures
(August 19, 2020)
Harvard Law School’s Harvard Program on Negotiation recently came out with their list of Top 10 Negotiation Failures for 2013.
https://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/negotiation-skills-daily/top-10-negotiation-failures-of-2013/
What can this list of Top 10 Negotiation Failures tell us about the value of Principled Negotiation and Wilson Learning’s NTY program? It can tell us a lot, actually.
- Putting Positions ahead of Interests: An overriding issue in almost all of these negotiations was the inability or unwillingness to focus on Interests rather than Positions. It is clear that both sides in every negotiation let their positions overshadow interests even though, on closer examination, it is clear that there were so many more Shared Interests than truly Opposed interests. Being focused on positions rather than interests may be one of the biggest factors in the failure of the North American Retail efforts to improve factory safety in Bangladesh (#5).
- The value of your BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement): Several on the list (specifically numbers 10, 9, 6, and 3) were failures because one or more sides did not consider their BATNAs. For example, in the Minnesota Orchestra dispute (#6), despite being settled in January 2014, the Orchestra Association lost $60 Million and the musicians lost over a year’s pay; neither was a conscious BATNA.
- Considering other stakeholders: At least two on the list (#10 and 8) were failures because other stakeholders not directly involved in the negotiation were ignored.The New York City Teachers Union (#10) failed to consider the actions of the Governor and Apple (#8) failed to consider the actions of the courts.
- Failure of Dirty Tricks: Barnes and Noble (#9) learned the hard way that dirty tricks often end in failure for both sides, as did Time Warner (#7).
- Not separating the People from the Problem: Obama and Putin (#4)-Does any more need to be said? How about North and South Korea (#2)?
- Not being clear on Shared, Differing and Opposed Interests: Agreement on gun control (#3) was in grasp of the US government, but for one issue that could have been addressed if the negotiators had better understood the difference among these types of Interests.
- Not Building a Golden Bridge: There is no better example of this than the defeat of gun control (#3).The Democratic Senators had a great opportunity to find a way to help Senators from conservative states address the concern of their constituents and not lose credibility in the deal. They did not and the whole thing died.
There are many other lessons that can be gained from this list. What do you think? What others have you identified?
Share via:
Об авторах
Michael Leimbach
Michael Leimbach, Ph.D., is a globally recognised expert in instructional design and sales development, sharing his message that it is not about what you learn but what you use. His approach has been adopted by numerous Global 1000 organisations in Australia, England, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and throughout the United States. Dr. Leimbach is Vice President of Global Research and Development for Wilson Learning Worldwide. With more than 25 years in the field, he provides leadership for researching and designing Wilson Learning’s diagnostic, learning, and performance improvement capabilities. He has managed major research studies in sales, leadership, and organisational effectiveness. Dr. Leimbach also developed Wilson Learning’s impact evaluation capability and return on investment models. He has served as a research consultant for a wide variety of global client organisations, is the Editor-in-Chief of the Advances in Developing Human Resources professional journal, and serves on the ISO Technical Committee on Quality Standards for Learning Service Providers. Dr. Leimbach has authored six books, published numerous professional articles, and is a frequent speaker at national and global conferences.
Anthony Pacifico
Anthony Pacifico is an organisational consultant with extensive experience in helping employees in organisations perform at the highest levels. He has direct experience with pharmaceutical industry, telecom industry, financial services industry and power equipment and robotics industry. His international experience includes conducting sessions in Germany, Rome, Madrid, Bali, Vevey (Switzerland) and Mexico for participants throughout the world. His specialities are: Sales Development and Sales Management, Negotiation Skills, Leadership Development and Project Management.
